Tag: Stafford loans

Some Ideas About Easing Student Loan Debt Burden

In the last blog, we discussed whether the government will just forgive student loans. The skeptic in me sees this as a long shot. So, what can be done, short of forgiving all students loans, that can ease the burden on borrowers? We are talking federal loans because that is the bulk of the $1.5 of outstanding student loan debt. Here are some ideas:

  1. Eliminate or significantly reduce origination fees. Right now, undergrads are paying a 1.062% origination fee on their Stafford loans. Not onerous. But, let’s look at Parent and Grad Plus loans. The current origination fee is 4.248%. That is highway robbery! Borrow $100K, owe $104,248 right off the bat. Not right. Reduce the origination fee to 1%.
  2. Decrease the interest rates. Right now, interest rates are 4.53% on Stafford loans. But, the interest rate for Parent and Grad Plus loans is currently 7.08%. There is no reason that the interest on Parent and Grad Plus loans should be any higher than Stafford loans. The interest rate should rate should be fixed at say, 4%. And stay at that rate. Yes, it could be a subsidy to the borrower if interest rates increase, but it is much less a subsidy than forgiving all loans.
  3. Right now, federal loans can be forgiven in an income based repayment plan after 20 years (depending on the program). However, after the loan is forgiven, you have to pay federal income tax on the amount forgiven. Out of the frying pan and into the fire. Any cancellation after years of payments should not be a taxable event.
  4. Amend the bankruptcy code on discharge of student loans. Prior to 1978, student loans were dischargeable in bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code of 1978 allowed a discharge for undue hardship or after 5 years of payments. In the 1980’s, the law was amended to allow discharge for undue hardship or after 7 years of payments. In the 1990’s, only proving undue hardship translated into a discharge. Undue hardship is extremely difficult and costly to prove. In NJ, you must show that if you paid your loan, you could not maintain a minimal standard of living, that situation will continue for the life of the loan, and you made a good faith effort to repay the loan. The problem for college grads is that the statistics show that their incomes tend to increase the longer that they are out of school. So, it is difficult, absent some disability, to convince a court that your inability to maintain a minimal standard of living will continue for 10-20 years. Go back to the discharge after 5-7 years of payments.
  5. Give employers tax incentives if they contribute to employees’ student loans. The employer gets a deduction, and the contribution is not taxable income for the employee. A recently introduced bill will allow employers to contribute up to $5250 per year tax free to be used for student loan repayment.

Final thought. We have to look at the source of the problem. That is that college and grad school in the US are way too expensive. Over the last 30 years, those costs have risen at twice the level of inflation. It is beyond my pay grade, but something has to be done to bring these costs down.

Prosper Act

The House Republicans recently introduced the Prosper Act which, in part, modifies existed law dealing with the availability and repayment of student loans.  Presently, undergraduates are eligible for Perkins loans which are subsidized and Direct Stafford loans which are subsidized and unsubsidized.  Subsidized means that the government pays the interest on the loan while the student is in school and for a grace period after the student leaves school.  Unsubsidized means that interest accrues from the time that the loan is drawn down but payments are deferred.  When you consider that the current rate of interest on undergrad Stafford loans is 4.29% and the average undergrad is in school for a little over 4 years, eliminating unsubsidized loans translate into a higher monthly payment for students.

The Prosper Act replaces the undergraduate Perkins and Direct loans with what is called a Federal One loan.  It also eliminates the 1%+ origination fee for undergraduate loans and the 4.27% origination fee for Parent Plus and Graduate Plus loans.  That is a savings.  It also increases the aggregate amount that an undergraduate can borrow under the Stafford program from $31,000 to $39,000 for dependent undergrads and from $57,500 to $60,250 for independent undergrads.  These amounts are caps.  Under the proposed bill, the school does not have to offer the cap amount to all students.  For example, it may offer the cap amount to engineering or IT students who have better prospects for a higher paying job upon graduation.  And, by the same token, it may offer less to, say, a history or anthropology major.

Currently, Parent Plus and Graduate Plus loans have no cap.  The parent or student can borrow the cost of attendance less any other aid offered to the student.  The proposed bill limits parents to $56,250.  I deal with many parents who have in excess of $100,000 of Parent Plus loans.  How are they going to make up the difference?  Each case is different, but I would suspect that parents will be forced to take on private loans which traditionally have not been as flexible as federal loans in regard to repayment options.

There are other parts to the proposed legislation which we will address in future blogs.